Dementia and dignity of identity: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

In the late stages of dementia, individuals rely on others for their wellbeing and this creates an ethical imperative for responsive dementia care. Through a qualitative evidence synthesis of literature on what constitutes responsive dementia care, we identified dignity of identity as a central theme. Dignity of identity is the status each of us holds in relation to others and reflects our past experiences and our aspirations for the future. We did a qualitative evidence synthesis of 10 qualitative studies conducted with a total of 149 research participants, 95 of whom had dementia, and 54 of whom were paid and family member caregivers to people with dementia. Using "new materialism disability studies" as our theoretical framework, we illustrate how environments, both material and discursive, shape the abilities of people with dementia in residential care settings (RSCs) to live well and we use our findings to point to ways forward in dignity of identity-enhancing dementia care practice. Echoing the literature, we observe that people with dementia have the virtual capacity to live with dignity of identity and illustrate how material conditions and discourse influence the transition of dignity of identity in people with dementia from a virtual capacity to an actual capacity and how demonstrated capacity in turn influences material conditions and discourse surrounding care for people with dementia in RSCs. We call for a greater acknowledgement within literature on dignity and dementia of structural barriers to dignity of identity-enhancing care. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown us the fatal consequences of insufficient material conditions in RCSs and we hope that on a societal level there is improvement to both the material conditions in RCSs as well as an improvement in discourse about those who live and work in RCSs.

High intelligence may exacerbate paediatric inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The body's innate and acquiredimmunesystems are critical in responses to a wide spectrum of assaults, including SARS-CoV-2 infection. We identify studies of autoimmunity to support our hypothesis that a high intelligence quotient (IQ) may put children at increased risk for severe COVID-19 sequelae; especially those whose viral load is high and/or who develop multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). MIS-C is associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 morbidity and death, even in otherwise healthy children. As information and evidence about SARS-CoV-2 infection continue to expand, our hypothesis suggests adding a potentially intriguing piece to the pandemic puzzle for further investigation. Drawing on a select review of published research and case reports, we discuss immune dysregulation in paediatric patients with a high IQ, including post-infection cytokine expression in the myocardium. Further, we provide a review of 27 paediatric (≤19 years; median age 16) cases of severe COVID-19 outcomes, drawn from media sources published between March and September 2020, in which we identify possible evidence of a 'hyper brain, hyper body' response to infection. We aver these cases are noteworthy given that paediatric death with COVID-19 disease is remarkably rare, and the estimated prevalence of a high IQ (or giftedness) is only 2% in the general population. These observations warrant prospective and retrospective studies of autoinflammatory markers and mechanisms to elucidate any special psychoneuroimmunological vulnerability in children with a high IQ, as such studies may raise implications for how and when prophylactic medical care is provided to children.